Hawaii Wave Seasonal Outlook

Hawaiʻi experiences multimodal seas, with independent wave systems generated from different source regions (Li et al., 2016). The complex wave climate demonstrates significant spatial-temporal variability across the islands as shown in Figure 1 and 2 for the seasonal mean and 90th percentile significant wave height (SWH). Previous studies have demonstrated a strong connection between large-scale climate variability and wave activity in subtropical regions based on low-resolution global wave hindcasts (Boucharel et al., 2021; Bromirski et al., 2013; Echevarria et al., 2020; Izaguirre et al., 2011; Kumar et al., 2022; Odériz et al., 2021, 2020; Stopa and Cheung, 2014). In this study, we further investigate the impact of global climate modes on Hawaii's coastal waves using a high-resolution hindcast data set from 1980 to 2024 to elucidate their distinct relationships with near‐shore wave activities. We had identified the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) as the primary and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) as the secondary climate modes influencing seasonal wave anomalies around the Hawaiian Islands.

Researchers at the University of Hawaiʻi recently developed an eXtended nonlinear Recharge Oscillator (XRO) model that provides skillful ENSO forecasts with lead times of up to 16–18 months (Zhao et al., 2024). The XRO model predicts ENSO evolution by explicitly accounting for interactions among the tropical Pacific, Indian, Atlantic, and extratropical Pacific Oceans. It has demonstrated forecast skill that exceeds many global climate models and is comparable to state-of-the-art artificial intelligence–based forecasting systems.

By combining the XRO model's long-lead ENSO predictions with the historical relationships between large-scale climate variability and Hawaiian wave conditions (Zhao et al., 2025), we developed the XRO Coupled Wave Model (XROWaveModel) to produce seasonal outlooks of SWH anomalies around the Hawaiian Islands.

Forecast confidence varies by region and season and is quantified using the anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) derived from retrospective forecasts over the 1980–2024 period.  In the monthly updated forecast maps, positive anomalies indicate significant wave heights exceeding the climatological average, while negative anomalies indicate below-normal wave conditions. Hatched regions denote areas where the hindcast ACC is less than 0.5, indicating reduced forecast skill and lower confidence. Conversely, forecasts in non-hatched regions have demonstrated higher historical skill and therefore carry greater confidence.

These seasonal wave outlooks represent three-month mean wave conditions and are intended to characterize broad climate-driven wave anomalies rather than individual storms or short-term wave variability.

Figure 1. Mean significant wave height seasonal climatology during 1980-2024.

Figure 2. 90th percentile significant wave height seasonal climatology during 1980-2024.

References:

Boucharel, J., Almar, R., Kestenare, E., Jin, F.-F., 2021. On the influence of ENSO complexity on Pan-Pacific coastal wave extremes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2115599118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115599118

Bromirski, P.D., Cayan, D.R., Helly, J., Wittmann, P., 2013. Wave power variability and trends across the North Pacific. JGR Oceans 118, 6329–6348. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009189

Echevarria, E.R., Hemer, M.A., Holbrook, N.J., Marshall, A.G., 2020. Influence of the Pacific‐South American Modes on the Global Spectral Wind‐Wave Climate. JGR Oceans 125, e2020JC016354. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016354

Izaguirre, C., Méndez, F.J., Menéndez, M., Losada, I.J., 2011. Global extreme wave height variability based on satellite data: WORLDWIDE EXTREME WAVE HEIGHT. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047302

Kumar, P., Sardana, D., Kaur, S., Pg, R., Rajni, Weller, E., 2022. Influence of climate variability on wind‐sea and swell wave height extreme over the Indo‐Pacific Ocean. Intl Journal of Climatology 42, 6183–6203. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7584

Li, N., Cheung, K.F., Stopa, J.E., Hsiao, F., Chen, Y.-L., Vega, L., Cross, P., 2016. Thirty-four years of Hawaii wave hindcast from downscaling of climate forecast system reanalysis. Ocean Modelling 100, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.02.001

Odériz, I., Silva, R., Mortlock, T.R., Mori, N., 2020. El Niño‐Southern Oscillation Impacts on Global Wave Climate and Potential Coastal Hazards. JGR Oceans 125, e2020JC016464. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016464

Odériz, I., Silva, R., Mortlock, T.R., Mori, N., Shimura, T., Webb, A., Padilla‐Hernández, R., Villers, S., 2021. Natural Variability and Warming Signals in Global Ocean Wave Climates. Geophysical Research Letters 48, e2021GL093622. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093622

Stopa, J.E., Cheung, K.F., 2014. Periodicity and patterns of ocean wind and wave climate. JGR Oceans 119, 5563–5584. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009729

Zhao, S., Jin, F.-F., Stuecker, M.F., Thompson, P.R., Kug, J.-S., McPhaden, M.J., Cane, M.A., Wittenberg, A.T., Cai, W., 2024. Explainable El Niño predictability from climate mode interactions. Nature 630, 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07534-6

Zhao, S., Li, N., Jin, F., Cheung, K.F., Yang, Z., 2025. Contrast and Predictability of Island‐Scale El Niño Influences on Hawaii Wave Climate. Geophysical Research Letters 52, e2024GL113127. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL113127

Previous
Previous

OWC Control

Next
Next

High Flow Pump